Sunday, March 30, 2008

Pollution Control Boards and Hapless Citizen. Noisy World.

Pollution Control Boards, NOISE Polluters – Hapless Citizen.

Our Pollution Control Boards, both at the State & Central levels, are name-sake Boards, without concomitant enforcement authority. In the grassroots level, it is Political & Money power that rules the roost. Ultimately, the hapless citizens suffer silently, putting up with the noisy neighborhood – without any remedy in his life.

Our PCBs ensure Media space during Diwali, Environment Day and such days round the year, by organizing Rallies & human-chains as a symbolic gesture. This is not conviction that works but convenience. The “concerned” citizens with a VIP or CELEBRITY to “project” the cause in hand, wear badges, caps, wave flags, make a run or rally, take pledges to mark this or that day. But no significant permanent remedial measures are devised or implemented for want of will and conviction towards the cause preached.

Our Politicians in power – thanks to the powerful lobbies – ensure that no permanent solutions are found or implemented. When some swoop down is attempted to contain Pollution, they ensure ‘restoration of peace’! It is a dramatic irony, in our Indian Democracy!? Anybody ‘booked’ for some offence would catch up his mentor - to find himself out of the clutches of Law, sooner or by paying up a ‘token’ fine. It is a simple Tom & Jerry game.

On the NOISE control front, if our PCBs were really powerful, we should not be having RATTLING Autos, two wheelers with bizarre exhausts and automobiles with ‘tuned’ mufflers in our roads, that whiz past us leaving us acoustically numbed until one could gather some sanity in his private seclusion – if he can find one. Add to this, the aero-planes with their high decibel take-offs, near Airport Area. Any peace loving person can’t put up with such rattling “tunes” in our neighborhood in his rightful living, guaranteed by our mighty Constitution.

While we talk of Bharath Stage-II & Bharath Stage-III emission control norms, we do not have any significant control norms on the NOISE front. The ill-tuned rattling noise that our Autos etc., contribute to our environment is simply un-healthy. Still, we naively stay put with them, accepting the noise - taking it as the “music” or cacophony of neighborhood. The damage they cause to our peaceful living is PROFOUND.

Is it not our PCBs duty to come down, with an Iron Hand on the noisy polluters? Should not our PCBs neutralize the noise by taking up the cause at the Industry Level with the Manufacturers - in the Manufacturing Stage itself? Are we wanting in innovations to neutralize NOISE? Those who ‘tune’ their ‘silencers’ could be dealt with, by the provisions of Law, when they VIOLATE - later.

On the sarcastic side, the rattling noise is released into our ears through their ‘silencers’. They are expected to SILENCE the noise, whereas in reality, they aggravate the noise! How come these rattlers are certified in the first place – to add ‘music’ to our living?

Where do we go – to get this redressed? Or is it put-up & perish game of LIFE?

REDUCING NOISE POLLUTION

courtesy- THE HINDU
Saturday, Mar 29, 2008

Reducing noise pollution in the neighbourhood
In case of violation of noise pollution rule, a representation can be made to the authorities including the Commissioner of Police, writes C.H.Gopinatha Rao

The High Court of Madras , while disposing of a Public interest Litigation petition (J.Mohana vs Commissioner of Police and others, Chennai 2006 (4) MLJ 525) made the following observations. If there is any violation of the noise pollution and the noise level exceeds the prescribed standard of the Pollution Control Board or other authority/authorities appropriate action will be taken to reduce the noise level.

In case of violation, representation can be made to the authori ties concerned including the Commissioner of Police.

In the above case the counsel appearing for the respondent against whom the complaint was made informed the Court that, in future the noise level would be controlled and would not exceed the prescribed standard.

The rule 7 (1) of the Noise pollution (Regulations and Control) Rules 2000 reads as follows. A person may if the noise level exceeds the ambient noise standards by 10 dB(A) or more given in the corresponding columns against any area /zone make a complaint to the authority Rule 7 ( 2) of the said rules provides as follows “The authority shall act on the complaint and take action against the violator in accordance with the provisions of these rules and any other law in force.”

The ambient noise standards for different zones as listed in the Noise Pollution (Regulations and Control) Rules 2000 given are listed below.

Silence zone

Silence zone is an area comprising not less than 100 metres around hospitals, educational institutions, courts, religious places or any other area so declared such by the competent authority. Mixed categories of areas may be declared as one of the four above mentioned categories by the competent authority.

Restrictions on the use of loud speaker

(1) A loud speaker or public address system shall not be used except after obtaining written permission from the authority.

(2) It should not be used at night between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. Except in closed premises for communication with in the auditorium, conference rooms, community halls and banquet halls,


(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in the above clause the State Government may subject to such terms and conditions as are necessary to reduce noise pollution and permit use of loud speakers during night between 10.00 p.m and midnight for any cultural or religious festival occasion for a limited duration not exceeding 15 days in a calendar year.

Powers to prohibit

(1) If the authority is satisfied from the report of an officer in charge of a police station or other information received by him including the complainant that it is necessary to do so in order to prevent annoyance, disturbance, discomfort or injury to the public, he may by a written order issue necessary directions to person concerned.

(2) The authority empowered may either on its own motion or on the application of any person aggrieved by an order made either rescind, modify or alter any such order.

The author is former National President, Institution of Valuers.