Sunday, January 31, 2010

creating awareness on the socially important issue of noise pollution

Thursday, Jan 28, 2010
Cutting noise

The editorial “Cutting noise” (Jan. 27) is a refreshing and timely reminder of the grave crisis facing the nation on account of noise pollution. Noise from vehicular traffic, loudspeakers, television, household equipment and kitchen appliances disrupts human activity and results in fatigue and stress. Deafness, blood pressure and mental illnesses are on the increase. Animals and vegetation are also susceptible to the harmful effects of noise.

K.S. Thampi,

Chennai

* * *

The number of cars and motorcycles on the roads has increased to alarming levels. Economic progress has raised the living standard of a section, and all of us are paying for it in terms of a decline in the quality of life. The utter disregard of our policymakers and opinion makers to noise pollution is surprising and worrisome. It is the flooding of the market with private vehicles by the government through its economic-growth-at-any-cost agenda that is primarily responsible for the high level of pollution.

K. Vijayakumar,

Bangalore

* * *

The effect of noise pollution is visible in our daily lives. Fire crackers, aircraft, vehicles, construction equipment, and jarring music — all these contribute to noise pollution. Although we seem to adjust to the noise by ignoring it, the body responds with tension. Anyone who wishes to live in peace, comfort and quiet within his house has a right to do so.

The law has treated noise pollution as a nuisance rather than a serious environmental problem. The legal definition of noise emission does not include rail and aircraft noise. Prevention and law-enforcement do not exist at all in some towns and cities. Loud-speakers have become indispensable instruments of effective public speech. Attempts to restrict such liberties must be justified.

K. Suresh Babu,

Tiruchi

* * *

The emphasis on creating greater awareness on the effects of noise is apt and timely. Two factors need special elaboration: First, the recognition that exposure to high, intense noise leads to hearing impairment, which is irreversible. Second, the effects of noise on physiological and mental processes manifest without our consciousness. You may forget noise, your body never will.

S. Raja,

Bangalore

* * *

Noise pollution is on the increase despite several campaigns by the government to check the rising levels. Buses, tractors, motorcycles, etc., produce a lot of noise. Adding to the woes is the constant honking by four-wheeler drivers. Senior citizens and patients are the worst sufferers.

Srinath Mahesh,

Noida

* * *

The high decibel levels in public meetings and music during marriage receptions are indeed disturbing. The observation that prolonged exposure to noise leads to hypertension is worth noting. Loud communications beat the very purpose of communication. They amount to an emotional attack on the listener.

S.V. Venugopalan,

Chennai

Friday, Jan 29, 2010

Cutting noise

The Hindu deserves to be congratulated on creating awareness on the socially important issue of noise pollution (editorial, Jan. 27). Noise pollution has been increasing over the years, thanks to the uncontrolled and unchecked use of gadgets that magnify the sound waves. While the noise from television sets is controllable, the noise generated through speakers during elections and religious festivals causes immense problems to the aged and patients with acute hypertension. The authorities are not effective in monitoring noise pollution, especially near hospitals and schools. Political activists and organisers of temple festivals need to be educated on the health hazards of high decibel noise. Unless those who violate the law are punished, helpless citizens will have to bear with the din.

V. Rajagopal,

Tirupati

* * *

The editorial highlights an issue that is often sidelined. As a mother of a four-month-old, I became fully aware of the impact of noise when I travelled on a two-wheeler with my child. Some drivers sound the horn just to advertise their presence on the road. For many, continuous honking is an alternative to alert and cautious driving.

Along with the enforcement of noise control, it is also necessary for the public to learn to use the horn sparingly and efficiently, rather than indiscriminately. Developing cities would do well to run comfortable and convenient public transport vehicles that will encourage people to use mass transport.

Ilavenil K. Joseph,

Tiruchi

* * *

While everyone is raising a hue and cry over global warming, environment pollution, air pollution and so on, no one seems to be paying attention to the irreparable damage inflicted on human beings, animals and the vegetation by noise pollution. The effect of noise is alarming.

Apart from the stress it causes, excessive and continuous noise can lead to deafness, high blood pressure and lack of concentration. For a safer and healthier population, we need to reduce, if not eliminate, unnecessary noise in our environment.

M.V. Nahusharaj,

Bangalore

* * *

Noise levels are increasing by the day with the rise in the number of automobiles, construction and other activities making the lives of people extremely difficult. Often, complaints are not addressed and people silently endure the assault on their senses. No doubt, there are laws dealing with noise pollution. But they are difficult to implement for a variety of reasons.

The government should enact laws stipulating the decibel level each device or equipment can produce and this should be followed at the manufacturer’s level.

H.N. Ramakrishna,

Bangalore

* * *
Sound need not be of high decibel to pollute. Repetitive irritating sounds can also be classified as noise. A typical example is the cacophony of mobile ring-tones and music that have infiltrated all spaces in our lives today. We shout instead of speaking, play loud music when ear-phones could be used, and burst loud fire crackers during Deepavali when lights alone should be enough to celebrate.

Education seems to have made no difference to our attitudes and we continue to perpetrate and abet noise pollution.

Varsha S. Shenoy,

Mangalore

* * *
One sure and practical way of reducing noise pollution is the creation of anti-noise pollution squads. They should be given the power to stop vehicles emitting too much noise and penalise them on the spot.

Licences should be renewed only after the noise levels of vehicles are tested. The squad should also be empowered to mute screaming loudspeakers on roadside places of worship. Religion cannot, and should not, come in the way of checking noise pollution.

D.V. Raghavan,

Bangalore

Cutting noise / THE HINDU Editorial on 27/1/2010

Courtesy : THE HINDU dt. 27/1/2010
http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/27/stories/2010012751090800.htm
Opinion - Editorials Printer  Friendly Page

Cutting noise

Noise is the permanent background score to life in bustling cities and towns. But when it exceeds a threshold, it disrupts the thought process and causes great annoyance. The World Health Organisation says it also affects health. Prolonged exposure to noise at particular levels can lead to hypertension. Other problems arising from chronic exposure include sleep disturbance, poor communication in classrooms, and hearing impairment. A decade ago, the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules 2000 issued under India’s Environment (Protection) Act 1986 promised to bring about change. Although the law is clear about the exposure limits for noise, the penalties, and the authorities responsible for enforcement, it has been unable to control the rising din. Given this background, it is difficult to imagine that the recent amendments to the rules notified by the Ministry of Environment and Forests will by themselves substantially reduce ambient noise. The amendments seek to make the rules more enforceable by bringing specific high-noise sources under their ambit. Thus horns, sound-emitting firecrackers, and sound-producing instruments may not be used in silence zones; protection from noise at night is also strengthened. State governments must now announce, in advance, the number and particulars of days on which there will be a regulated relaxation of norms for cultural or religious festive occasions.

The Environment (Protection) Act empowers the central government to plan and execute a countrywide programme for the prevention, abatement, and control of environmental pollution. Noise pollution is a good place to start. The State governments, which have enforcement authority on the ground, must act here and now. There is no justification, for example, to allow transport vehicles such as autorickshaws to tamper with silencers to generate noise for ‘visibility’ on the road. The amended rules stipulate that the noise level at the boundary of a public place should not exceed the legal noise standard by 10 dB(A) — the decibel unit — or 75 dB(A), whichever is lower. After a long era of poor voluntary compliance and enforcement, the first order priority is obviously to create greater awareness in the community on the effects of noise; vigorous enforcement can follow. Improving the motoring culture to restrict the use of horns through campaigns and strong persuasion is vital. Governments can take the lead and contribute directly to lowering of noise levels by replacing the large number of rickety transport buses that they run — and by repairing roads.