The noise levels in the city constantly remain above the prescribed standards

We are DEAF to our neighbourhood NOISE! What are we going to do about it?

Courtesy : THE HINDU dt.28/7/2011

Noise levels in city above standards

Deepa H Ramakrishnan

The noise levels in the city constantly remain above the prescribed standards, according to data recorded under the National Ambient Noise Monitoring Network of the Central Pollution Control Board.

The noise levels have been monitored round the clock at Triplicane, Government Eye Hospital in Egmore, Guindy, Perambur, T.Nagar since March. Near the Government Eye hospital, which has been classified as a residential area, on Tuesday the maximum recorded sound during 24 hours was 67 decibels (A) and on Monday it was 67.2 dB(A).

A, in dB(A), denotes the frequency weighting in the measurement of noise and corresponds to frequency response characteristics of the human ear. The standard for residential area is 55 dB(A) during the day time and 45 dB(A) at night.

At Guindy, identified as a commercial area, the daily maximum noise levels are constantly above 77 dB(A). Triplicane too has been classified as a commercial area and the figures hover around 69 – 70 dB(A). On certain days like Sunday, it touched 76.7 dB(A). The noise monitoring station in Perambur, an industrial area, recorded 70.6 dB(A) on Tuesday and 69.8dB(A) on Monday.

M.L.Munjal, honorary professor, IIS, Bangalore, also the Chairman of the National Committee for Noise Pollution Control, said efforts must be taken to inculcate road discipline among motorists and pedestrians.

A citizen has a right to complain about noise that disturbs him.

Courtesy : THE HINDU 31/7/2011 OPEN PAGE

Are we becoming a nation of noise-makers?

D. B. N. Murthy

“Noise should be seen but not heard,” states one advertisement for window glass. However, we Indians love noise — the more the better! That's the reason why we do not pay much attention given to noise reduction in homes.

An incident of outside noise causing problem to a residential area came up a few years ago. The newly opened high-rise building had installed an air-conditioner. The water used was re-circulated by cooling through a motor/pump. This set off a continuous humming sound that was a source of annoyance to the neighbourhood. A complaint given to the owner of the building was ignored stating that the noise was within limits.

Thoroughly disappointed with such a negative attitude, some of the residents approached the Corporation authorities. Thanks to the investigation work done by the inspector concerned, the owner agreed to install a barrier to contain the sound. Then the noise level reduced considerably much to the relief of the residents, who had suffered for so long.

Traffic noise is one of the sources of noise that affects a householder. He/she has little control over such man-made noise, except taking certain steps to minimise the effect of noise inside. Plants outside, where possible, could cut some of the noise. Blinds and drapes on windows could further act as barriers. It is rare to see a construction, which has proactively taken steps to install noise-reducing steps such as fixing foam boards and other sound absorbing materials inside or outside the walls. That applies to windows, which could have a frame outside that could absorb or deflect sound.

Noise generated inside a house is rarely recognised by someone who has been living along. He/she fails to appreciate the fact that the noise level is high and could have long-term deleterious effects such as loss of hearing or other effects on the human body due to prolonged exposure to noise. There are a few sources of noise inside a house — TV, music system, air-conditioner, washing machine, refrigerator, microwave and so on.

Some of the modern domestic appliances have less noise level. For example, a refrigerator, as it is on continuous operation, makes a buzzing noise when the compressor is activated periodically. The modern refrigerator, especially the compressor, is improved as far as energy and noise level are concerned as compared to the older versions. It would be desirable if the householder pays attention to noise emanating from domestic appliances and seeks advice before buying a particular model. While some noise is unavoidable, one has to look for constant buzz or heavy noise that could lead to long-term effects without one's knowledge.

Loss of hearing is one health hazard which one recognises when it's too late. Personal stereos and cellphones should be used with caution, preferably at reduced sound levels or with hand-held devices and that too sparingly. Another problem are noisy neighbours! We can only appeal to them to tone their TV/music system and talk/laugh less loudly!

Indoor drapes, shades, indoor plants and lower noise domestic equipment are the means to achieve lower noise levels for a comfortable living. A floor could have sound absorbing materials coated to minimise noise when someone walks on it. Sound absorbing material could be fixed inside or outside at strategic locations which could minimise the external noise effect. That applies to noise deflectors, such as barriers and plants that could deflect noise if it is from any specific location.

Noise could lead to health hazards, besides spoiling one's mood when someone seeks quiet and peace at his/own home. The government has fixed a limit of 55 db maximum for residential areas during daytime and 45 db maximum during nighttime, which unfortunately is followed more in the breach than in practice. A citizen has a right to complain about noise that disturbs him. Police could lend a helping hand to shut down loudspeakers beyond 10 p.m. or warn a boisterous party going on next door.

(The writer's email is dbnvimi@gmail.com)

From the womb to the tomb, it is a life of audio attack.

Courtesy : THE MADRAS MUSINGS
Vol. XXI No. 7, July 16-31, 2011

Chennoise – that's who we are

(By Prabha Sridevan)

• Living in Chennai is equivalent to living in a factory – at least in terms of how much noise all the residents are subjected to. Data from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) shows that the noise levels everywhere in Chennai are over 100 dB – more than a typical factory. The average noise level in Chennai is actually higher at more than 129 decibels. It must be noted that pain in the ear begins at 125 decibels. The permissible limit is 85 dB fixed by the World Health Organisation (WHO).

The above is an extract from a newspaper. Maybe we can call ourselves Chennoise? We shout, we scream, we are loud.

We believe in loudness for all seasons. We have devotion and faith blaring from those cone things in every street and you worry whether closing your ears is a sacrilege. In fact, there have been cases in the Madras High Court where petitioners have complained of this noise assault. But Chennai does not care.

We have huge commercial establishments in residential streets, schools in cul-de-sacs, kalyana mandapams in what used to be quiet streets. The offices have noisy generators and neighbours are asked to “adjist” when they complain of the noise. Wedding receptions, of course, must have what is called light music concerts. How is it “light”, pray? Weddings are social occasions too, when we meet friends and relatives, renew bonds. It is just not about the ‘girl’ and the ‘boy’ coming together. But with these huge speakers drowning out normal sounds, we are zonked into silence. This is about dear ones coming together. The story is the same when dear ones depart. From the womb to the tomb, it is a life of audio attack.

But what do you expect? Schools shout. Children warble away into microphones in quiet avenues. People use drilling equipment all the 24 hours repairing their flats with no thought for the elders, the sick, the infants in the neighbouring places. Yes, it is your house and you have the right to set it right. But it is their living space too, they have the right to some peace and quiet. Why can’t we inform our neighbours that we will drill or hammer from, let’s say, 9 a.m. to 3 p.m? We don’t care about anyone else when we raise the noise decibel. So, kids learn that it is all right to be loud and insensitive. And as grown-ups they continue to be loud and forget the virtues of silence.

There are silences and silences. To name some, there is the silence of spirituality, the silence of a learner, the silence of loyalty, the silence of ignorance, the silence of weakness, the silence of cowardice, the silence of reverence, the silence of companionship and even the forced silence. Some are positive silences, some are not. For instance, the silence of omerta imposed by the Mafiosi is not silence but muteness born of fear. When Peter denied Christ thrice before the cock crew, that was not the right silence. The elders failed to speak and were silent, when the Pandava queen was disrobed; that was a silence of adharma.

Being quiet is a kindness to others and to us. It is an act of respect. It is an act of ahimsa. Actually it is the incessant noise that translates into violence in our lives. As a city we must stop being noisy. Is Chennai afraid of silence? We fill our space with noise, or at least with texting, shuffling or ipoding, which are all noise too of a different kind.

As I said, our marriages are noisy, our last processions are noisy, our religious celebrations are noisy, we are buffeted by noises and have got so used to it that we have become strangers to that silence which is the stillness of being.

I see walkers wiring their ears with some music. Actually there are birds even now in Chennai. Please listen to those minstrels. That music may soon die into eternity. But no, we proudly walk with wired ears not wanting to listen to the ‘cheep cheep’. Is it so difficult to be with myself in silence, that even when I walk I need aural company? Zen master Thich Nhat Hanh recommends walking meditation where the very simple act of walking is transcended into a deeply healing tool which tells us how to be in the here and now.

The Dakshinamurthi icon creates for us a teacher and students learning in silence. There is a verse which is a beautiful study in contrast and it is also about silence. It asks us to picture at the base of the vata tree the aged disciples and the young teacher! The teacher explains wordlessly and the doubts of the students are shattered. The scene is so tranquil and so peaceful. He is not burdened by the thought of having to teach the hardest lesson, the Lesson of Knowledge. The space under the shade of the tree is one of silent communication and silent communion. Knowledge is transmitted easily and in silence because the students are ready to receive it. Their minds are silent too, not clamouring with conflicting thoughts. The space is free of noise; both noise inside and noise outside.

But what about today’s teacher? We will look at the ordinary teacher who is buffeted by myriad problems, who is there only for the paycheck and not for love of teaching or for love of children. There is neither peace nor tranquillity in her mind nor in her life. Her students do not know what silence is, for they come from noisy homes and are sent to noisy schools. She scrawls her name in the staff register, and rushes into the classroom, unprepared for that day’s lesson. The first words she says are, “Children! Silence please!” The children may stop shouting, but that is not the learning silence. We must teach children the richness of silence. We must teach them the virtue of being quiet. We must teach them not to be restless in silence.

Every religious tradition has the vow of silence or practice of silence as an integral part of it. The technique of Vipassana is about learning to be silent. The Cistercian Order or Trappist Order is very strict about silence. Obviously, then, silence is a sine qua non for spiritual evolution. The largest Muslim country in the world, Indonesia, declares a national holiday each year to mark the Hindu-majority Bali’s day of silence, Hari Raya Nyepi Tahun Baru. This profound concept has been absorbed into the beautiful Muslim-Hindu culture of that unique nation. It seems that on that day the streets are empty, no TV, no radio, no entertainment, nothing. It is a day devoted to introspection. Though it is a Hindu festival, everyone, even non-Hindus, willingly adopts silence that day. Imagine the whole of India turning inwards and silent for a day! Do you think we can start with Chennai? Nope. I have as much hope as an icicle has of survival in hell.

There is a book called, The Sacred Tree, compiled by The Four World Development Project from contributions by the Native elders, spiritual leaders and professionals of various Native communities in North America. It is a stunning evidence of the wisdom of the original people of North America. How much have we lost by not listening to such people? In this book, we read, “A sign that much work is needed in the area of personal spiritual growth is when a person dislikes being alone, and especially dislikes being alone in silence. Many people use television or recorded music to fill the silence so that they do not have to experience themselves as they really are. To face ourselves in silence, and to love ourselves because the Creator has made us beautiful are things that every developing human being needs to learn.” Wow! All of us, not just the Chennoise are stunted in spiritual growth, tested against this standard. Sigh!

Tampering with autorickshaws' silencers leads to noise pollution

courtesy THE HINDU - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011
None can be silent on this Ajai Sreevatsan

Tampering with autorickshaws' silencers leads to noise pollution

---

Autorickshaw drivers say MTC buses and other vehicles do not adhere to norms either

---

CHENNAI: Fifty-year-old K.E. Rajamannar, a resident of Velachery, has a curious wake-up alarm. It is the deafening sound from an autorickshaw zipping past his home. The noise wakes him with a start at 5.30 a.m. with alarming regularity.

Marginal savings

Most of the 53,000-odd autorickshaws in the city operate with tampered silencers.

Autorickshaw drivers admit that it is a violation of noise pollution norms, but cite marginal savings on fuel and better pick-up acceleration as factors that push them to tamper with the silencer.

“The noise is extremely irritating. We are losing peace. I am not an expert, but something should be added or removed from the silencer to convert the vehicles into normal autorickshaws,” says Mr. Rajamannar.

Autorickshaws coming out of the production line have something called ‘noise mufflers'. The cup-shaped device encloses the silencer and helps in reducing the noise from the exhaust.

However, autorickshaw drivers such as J. Seshasayanam, general secretary of the Madras Metro Auto Drivers' Association, say that the first thing that a driver does to a new vehicle is to remove these mufflers.

“The cups restrict the smooth flow of exhaust air. By removing it, drivers achieve better pick-up acceleration and also marginally save on fuel cost. It is also a business tactic. The public has to hear the sound of an autorickshaw approaching,” he says.

Though he accepts that it is mistake, Mr. Seshasayanam says that even MTC buses and other government vehicles do not adhere to noise pollution norms and “we cannot be expected to be perfect”.

Never checked

He adds that it is easy to get through the Fitness Certificate (FC) process despite the silencer tampering as “most vehicles are never checked.”

Though complaints from residents and road users about the sound emanating from the autorickshaws is increasingly becoming common, only 119 cases were registered against the drivers for silencer tampering in 2010.

C. Jacinth, Director, Institute of Otorhino Laryngology, Government General Hospital, says that while the human ear can tolerate noise levels of only 70dB, engine noise from autorickshaws with tampered silencers can go up to 140 dB.

In a recent study done by the hospital on hearing impairment among street vendors, most participants showed signs of partial deafness.

“Noise pollution is a serious menace. But nobody is addressing it,” said Dr . Jacinth.

Sumaira Abdulali of the Awaaz Foundation, an NGO that works in the field of noise pollution, says that autorickshaw drivers have simply not been told that noise is harmful and illegal.

Dangerous trend

“Similar to the mandatory Pollution Under Control (PUC) certificate, vehicles must be made to undergo regular noise checks and certified. Noise is as much an aspect of a vehicle's road worthiness as anything else. To be heard above the noise that their engines generate, motorists are resorting to louder horns. This is a dangerous trend,” she adds.

M. Ravi, Additional Commissioner of Police (Traffic), said that autorickshaw drivers cannot claim fuel saving as an excuse to violate the law.

“If it is not permitted, it is illegal. We will have to go in for random checks in coordination with the Transport Department to curb this practice.”

courtesy : THE HINDU 11/7/2010

DOC TALK

High decibel impact

While the vuvuzela may be a great way to cheer your favourite team, remember it could also cause problems with your hearing. DR. RAVI RAMALINGAM tells you how.

Photo: AFP

Vuvuzela, the ancient South African horn, has found its way into FIFA and the headlines this soccer season. Although many soccer fans seem to see it as a way of egging their teams on, most people are unaware of its impact on their hearing mechanism!

Vuvuzela, the wind instrument invented by Neil Von Schalkwyk, creates a droning sound measuring 144dB, which is way above the normal recommended hearing range of -20 dB and +25 dB. When noise is too loud, it begins to kill nerve's endings in the inner ear. As the exposure time to loud noise increases, more and more nerve endings are destroyed. As the number of nerve endings decreases the hearing ability also dips. There is no way to restore life to dead nerve endings; the damage is permanent.

Habitual exposure to noise above 85 dB will cause a gradual hearing loss in a significant number of individuals and louder noises will accelerate this damage. For unprotected ears, the allowed exposure time decreases by one half for each five dB increase in average noise level. For instance, exposure is limited to 8 hours at 90 dB, 4 hours at 95 dB, and 2 hours at 100 dB. The highest permissible noise exposure for the unprotected ear is 115 dB for 15 minutes/day. Any noise above 140 dB is not permitted.

People differ in their sensitivity to noise. As a general rule, noise may damage hearing if a person has to shout over background noise to be heard. Repeated noise from the vuvuzela could hurt the ears since it can make the ears ring or make the person slightly deaf for several hours after exposure to the noise. Much to the chagrin of the players, broadcasters, spectators and television viewers alike, the FIFA refused to ban the Vuvuzela.

A ringing in the ears called tinnitus commonly occurs after noise exposure, and it often becomes permanent. Some people react to loud noise with anxiety and irritability; it may trigger an increase in the pulse rate and blood pressure or may even result in acidity. Very loud noise can reduce efficiency in performing difficult tasks by diverting attention from the job.

Prof. Dr Ravi Ramalingam is a Chennai-based ENT specialist and surgeon. Website: www.kkrenthospital.org

The decibel (dB)

Intensity of sound is measured in decibels (dB). The scale runs from the faintest sound the human ear can detect, which is labeled 0dB, to over 180dB, the noise at a rocket pad during launch. Decibels are measured logarithmically. This means that as decibel intensity increases by units of 10, each increase is 10 times the lower figure. Thus, 20 decibels is 10 times the intensity of 10 decibels, and 30 decibels is 100 times as intense as 10 decibels.

creating awareness on the socially important issue of noise pollution

Thursday, Jan 28, 2010
Cutting noise

The editorial “Cutting noise” (Jan. 27) is a refreshing and timely reminder of the grave crisis facing the nation on account of noise pollution. Noise from vehicular traffic, loudspeakers, television, household equipment and kitchen appliances disrupts human activity and results in fatigue and stress. Deafness, blood pressure and mental illnesses are on the increase. Animals and vegetation are also susceptible to the harmful effects of noise.

K.S. Thampi,

Chennai

* * *

The number of cars and motorcycles on the roads has increased to alarming levels. Economic progress has raised the living standard of a section, and all of us are paying for it in terms of a decline in the quality of life. The utter disregard of our policymakers and opinion makers to noise pollution is surprising and worrisome. It is the flooding of the market with private vehicles by the government through its economic-growth-at-any-cost agenda that is primarily responsible for the high level of pollution.

K. Vijayakumar,

Bangalore

* * *

The effect of noise pollution is visible in our daily lives. Fire crackers, aircraft, vehicles, construction equipment, and jarring music — all these contribute to noise pollution. Although we seem to adjust to the noise by ignoring it, the body responds with tension. Anyone who wishes to live in peace, comfort and quiet within his house has a right to do so.

The law has treated noise pollution as a nuisance rather than a serious environmental problem. The legal definition of noise emission does not include rail and aircraft noise. Prevention and law-enforcement do not exist at all in some towns and cities. Loud-speakers have become indispensable instruments of effective public speech. Attempts to restrict such liberties must be justified.

K. Suresh Babu,

Tiruchi

* * *

The emphasis on creating greater awareness on the effects of noise is apt and timely. Two factors need special elaboration: First, the recognition that exposure to high, intense noise leads to hearing impairment, which is irreversible. Second, the effects of noise on physiological and mental processes manifest without our consciousness. You may forget noise, your body never will.

S. Raja,

Bangalore

* * *

Noise pollution is on the increase despite several campaigns by the government to check the rising levels. Buses, tractors, motorcycles, etc., produce a lot of noise. Adding to the woes is the constant honking by four-wheeler drivers. Senior citizens and patients are the worst sufferers.

Srinath Mahesh,

Noida

* * *

The high decibel levels in public meetings and music during marriage receptions are indeed disturbing. The observation that prolonged exposure to noise leads to hypertension is worth noting. Loud communications beat the very purpose of communication. They amount to an emotional attack on the listener.

S.V. Venugopalan,

Chennai

Friday, Jan 29, 2010

Cutting noise

The Hindu deserves to be congratulated on creating awareness on the socially important issue of noise pollution (editorial, Jan. 27). Noise pollution has been increasing over the years, thanks to the uncontrolled and unchecked use of gadgets that magnify the sound waves. While the noise from television sets is controllable, the noise generated through speakers during elections and religious festivals causes immense problems to the aged and patients with acute hypertension. The authorities are not effective in monitoring noise pollution, especially near hospitals and schools. Political activists and organisers of temple festivals need to be educated on the health hazards of high decibel noise. Unless those who violate the law are punished, helpless citizens will have to bear with the din.

V. Rajagopal,

Tirupati

* * *

The editorial highlights an issue that is often sidelined. As a mother of a four-month-old, I became fully aware of the impact of noise when I travelled on a two-wheeler with my child. Some drivers sound the horn just to advertise their presence on the road. For many, continuous honking is an alternative to alert and cautious driving.

Along with the enforcement of noise control, it is also necessary for the public to learn to use the horn sparingly and efficiently, rather than indiscriminately. Developing cities would do well to run comfortable and convenient public transport vehicles that will encourage people to use mass transport.

Ilavenil K. Joseph,

Tiruchi

* * *

While everyone is raising a hue and cry over global warming, environment pollution, air pollution and so on, no one seems to be paying attention to the irreparable damage inflicted on human beings, animals and the vegetation by noise pollution. The effect of noise is alarming.

Apart from the stress it causes, excessive and continuous noise can lead to deafness, high blood pressure and lack of concentration. For a safer and healthier population, we need to reduce, if not eliminate, unnecessary noise in our environment.

M.V. Nahusharaj,

Bangalore

* * *

Noise levels are increasing by the day with the rise in the number of automobiles, construction and other activities making the lives of people extremely difficult. Often, complaints are not addressed and people silently endure the assault on their senses. No doubt, there are laws dealing with noise pollution. But they are difficult to implement for a variety of reasons.

The government should enact laws stipulating the decibel level each device or equipment can produce and this should be followed at the manufacturer’s level.

H.N. Ramakrishna,

Bangalore

* * * Sound need not be of high decibel to pollute. Repetitive irritating sounds can also be classified as noise. A typical example is the cacophony of mobile ring-tones and music that have infiltrated all spaces in our lives today. We shout instead of speaking, play loud music when ear-phones could be used, and burst loud fire crackers during Deepavali when lights alone should be enough to celebrate.

Education seems to have made no difference to our attitudes and we continue to perpetrate and abet noise pollution.

Varsha S. Shenoy,

Mangalore

* * * One sure and practical way of reducing noise pollution is the creation of anti-noise pollution squads. They should be given the power to stop vehicles emitting too much noise and penalise them on the spot.

Licences should be renewed only after the noise levels of vehicles are tested. The squad should also be empowered to mute screaming loudspeakers on roadside places of worship. Religion cannot, and should not, come in the way of checking noise pollution.

D.V. Raghavan,

Bangalore

Cutting noise / THE HINDU Editorial on 27/1/2010

Courtesy : THE HINDU dt. 27/1/2010
http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/27/stories/2010012751090800.htm
Opinion - Editorials

Cutting noise

Noise is the permanent background score to life in bustling cities and towns. But when it exceeds a threshold, it disrupts the thought process and causes great annoyance. The World Health Organisation says it also affects health. Prolonged exposure to noise at particular levels can lead to hypertension. Other problems arising from chronic exposure include sleep disturbance, poor communication in classrooms, and hearing impairment. A decade ago, the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules 2000 issued under India’s Environment (Protection) Act 1986 promised to bring about change. Although the law is clear about the exposure limits for noise, the penalties, and the authorities responsible for enforcement, it has been unable to control the rising din. Given this background, it is difficult to imagine that the recent amendments to the rules notified by the Ministry of Environment and Forests will by themselves substantially reduce ambient noise. The amendments seek to make the rules more enforceable by bringing specific high-noise sources under their ambit. Thus horns, sound-emitting firecrackers, and sound-producing instruments may not be used in silence zones; protection from noise at night is also strengthened. State governments must now announce, in advance, the number and particulars of days on which there will be a regulated relaxation of norms for cultural or religious festive occasions.

The Environment (Protection) Act empowers the central government to plan and execute a countrywide programme for the prevention, abatement, and control of environmental pollution. Noise pollution is a good place to start. The State governments, which have enforcement authority on the ground, must act here and now. There is no justification, for example, to allow transport vehicles such as autorickshaws to tamper with silencers to generate noise for ‘visibility’ on the road. The amended rules stipulate that the noise level at the boundary of a public place should not exceed the legal noise standard by 10 dB(A) — the decibel unit — or 75 dB(A), whichever is lower. After a long era of poor voluntary compliance and enforcement, the first order priority is obviously to create greater awareness in the community on the effects of noise; vigorous enforcement can follow. Improving the motoring culture to restrict the use of horns through campaigns and strong persuasion is vital. Governments can take the lead and contribute directly to lowering of noise levels by replacing the large number of rickety transport buses that they run — and by repairing roads.

Pollution Control Boards and Hapless Citizen. Noisy World.

Pollution Control Boards, NOISE Polluters – Hapless Citizen.

Our Pollution Control Boards, both at the State & Central levels, are name-sake Boards, without concomitant enforcement authority. In the grassroots level, it is Political & Money power that rules the roost. Ultimately, the hapless citizens suffer silently, putting up with the noisy neighborhood – without any remedy in his life.

Our PCBs ensure Media space during Diwali, Environment Day and such days round the year, by organizing Rallies & human-chains as a symbolic gesture. This is not conviction that works but convenience. The “concerned” citizens with a VIP or CELEBRITY to “project” the cause in hand, wear badges, caps, wave flags, make a run or rally, take pledges to mark this or that day. But no significant permanent remedial measures are devised or implemented for want of will and conviction towards the cause preached.

Our Politicians in power – thanks to the powerful lobbies – ensure that no permanent solutions are found or implemented. When some swoop down is attempted to contain Pollution, they ensure ‘restoration of peace’! It is a dramatic irony, in our Indian Democracy!? Anybody ‘booked’ for some offence would catch up his mentor - to find himself out of the clutches of Law, sooner or by paying up a ‘token’ fine. It is a simple Tom & Jerry game.

On the NOISE control front, if our PCBs were really powerful, we should not be having RATTLING Autos, two wheelers with bizarre exhausts and automobiles with ‘tuned’ mufflers in our roads, that whiz past us leaving us acoustically numbed until one could gather some sanity in his private seclusion – if he can find one. Add to this, the aero-planes with their high decibel take-offs, near Airport Area. Any peace loving person can’t put up with such rattling “tunes” in our neighborhood in his rightful living, guaranteed by our mighty Constitution.

While we talk of Bharath Stage-II & Bharath Stage-III emission control norms, we do not have any significant control norms on the NOISE front. The ill-tuned rattling noise that our Autos etc., contribute to our environment is simply un-healthy. Still, we naively stay put with them, accepting the noise - taking it as the “music” or cacophony of neighborhood. The damage they cause to our peaceful living is PROFOUND.

Is it not our PCBs duty to come down, with an Iron Hand on the noisy polluters? Should not our PCBs neutralize the noise by taking up the cause at the Industry Level with the Manufacturers - in the Manufacturing Stage itself? Are we wanting in innovations to neutralize NOISE? Those who ‘tune’ their ‘silencers’ could be dealt with, by the provisions of Law, when they VIOLATE - later.

On the sarcastic side, the rattling noise is released into our ears through their ‘silencers’. They are expected to SILENCE the noise, whereas in reality, they aggravate the noise! How come these rattlers are certified in the first place – to add ‘music’ to our living?

Where do we go – to get this redressed? Or is it put-up & perish game of LIFE?

REDUCING NOISE POLLUTION

courtesy- THE HINDU
Saturday, Mar 29, 2008

Reducing noise pollution in the neighbourhood

In case of violation of noise pollution rule, a representation can be made to the authorities including the Commissioner of Police, writes C.H.Gopinatha Rao

The High Court of Madras , while disposing of a Public interest Litigation petition (J.Mohana vs Commissioner of Police and others, Chennai 2006 (4) MLJ 525) made the following observations. If there is any violation of the noise pollution and the noise level exceeds the prescribed standard of the Pollution Control Board or other authority/authorities appropriate action will be taken to reduce the noise level.

In case of violation, representation can be made to the authori ties concerned including the Commissioner of Police.

In the above case the counsel appearing for the respondent against whom the complaint was made informed the Court that, in future the noise level would be controlled and would not exceed the prescribed standard.

The rule 7 (1) of the Noise pollution (Regulations and Control) Rules 2000 reads as follows. A person may if the noise level exceeds the ambient noise standards by 10 dB(A) or more given in the corresponding columns against any area /zone make a complaint to the authority Rule 7 ( 2) of the said rules provides as follows “The authority shall act on the complaint and take action against the violator in accordance with the provisions of these rules and any other law in force.”

The ambient noise standards for different zones as listed in the Noise Pollution (Regulations and Control) Rules 2000 given are listed below.

Silence zone

Silence zone is an area comprising not less than 100 metres around hospitals, educational institutions, courts, religious places or any other area so declared such by the competent authority. Mixed categories of areas may be declared as one of the four above mentioned categories by the competent authority.

Restrictions on the use of loud speaker

(1) A loud speaker or public address system shall not be used except after obtaining written permission from the authority.

(2) It should not be used at night between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. Except in closed premises for communication with in the auditorium, conference rooms, community halls and banquet halls,

(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in the above clause the State Government may subject to such terms and conditions as are necessary to reduce noise pollution and permit use of loud speakers during night between 10.00 p.m and midnight for any cultural or religious festival occasion for a limited duration not exceeding 15 days in a calendar year.

Powers to prohibit

(1) If the authority is satisfied from the report of an officer in charge of a police station or other information received by him including the complainant that it is necessary to do so in order to prevent annoyance, disturbance, discomfort or injury to the public, he may by a written order issue necessary directions to person concerned.

(2) The authority empowered may either on its own motion or on the application of any person aggrieved by an order made either rescind, modify or alter any such order.

The author is former National President, Institution of Valuers.

Little noise about noise pollution

Business Line
Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Tuesday, Oct 08, 2002

Little noise about noise pollution

P. P. Sangal

Apart from causing hearing impairment, noise pollution can play havoc with the nervous system, affecting the physical and psychological behaviour of the individuals. But the Noise Pollution Rules seem to be observed more in the breach, with implementing authorities unwilling to interfere with cultural celebrations.

NOISE pollution, unlike air, water, land/soil pollution, is not taken seriously in our country. It appears that control of noise pollution remains a domain of the developed West. It is due to our sheer ignorance about the hazards of noise pollution.

The main factors contributing to noise pollution are vehicular traffic, industrial activities, various electrical appliances, sources of entertainment such as blaring musical systems, TVs, public address systems, running trains and air traffic, splutter of gensets every time power breaks down, and so on. It is mostly the people living in metropolitan cities or other big towns or those working in factories who are victims of noise pollution and it affects the rich and the poor alike. While the problem is on a much smaller scale in small towns and villages, those residing or working in buildings along the main highways or close to railway tracks are also affected to a great extent.

According to a study by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) New Delhi, exposure to noise pollution exceeding 75 decibels (db) for more than eight hours daily over a long period of time can cause loss of hearing due to destruction of hair cells of the inner ear and also the sensitive nerve fibres. The hazard increases with the intensity of the noise and the period of exposure. The sound produced by a bursting cracker, exceeding 150 db, can cause a ringing sensation called `tinnitus' and can impair hearing permanently, according to ENT specialists. The study also reveals that about 1 per cent of the population suffers from noise-induced pollution. There is a hearing loss among 43 per cent of the workers at Bokaro Steel Plant, Durgapur. But, who cares?

It is just not hearing at risk. Noise pollution can play havoc with the nervous system, affecting the physical and psychological behaviour of the individuals. It may cause nausea, vomiting, pain, hypertension, high blood pressure and cardiovascular problems. A survey of more than 1,000 people in Kolkata, carried in 1998, revealed that 28 per cent suffered from hypertension and irritability caused by traffic noises. Similarly, a study by the Post-graduate School of Basic Medical Sciences, Chennai, confirmed that in 50 per cent of the industries, workers exposed to higher intensities of sound are short- tempered with tendency to even disrupt production.

Noise pollution may also cause insomnia and impair sexual performance and also learning ability in children. Unborn children are at risk too if they are exposed to high level noise during pregnancy as it affects the immature `cochlea' — the spiral cavity of the ear. Babies born to the weavers are a case in point. Such babies are hard of hearing because they are exposed to the loud clacking of looms long before they take birth.

Studies in the US have shown that in case of a disc jockey at a night club, working four-hour shift only three days a week for 10 years, there is a 40 per cent chance that he will not be able hear a normal conversation. A voluntary organisation `Mumbai Grahak Panchayat' working for noise pollution has discovered that the average of deafness in India has gone down from 70 years to 50 years now. Is it not alarming? Many such studies by reputed agencies can be quoted.

It must be known that noise levels in residential areas should not exceed 55 db. But the noise levels generated by various sources, which matter in our daily life, are much higher. For example, a telephone bell rings at 70 db, TVs produce 70 db, vacuum cleaners produce noise at 80 db, vehicle noise goes unto 90 db, motor bikes produce 110 db at acceleration, amplified rock band has a noise level of 120 db and a jet air plane takes off at 140 db. Thus, we are constantly being harmed by noise pollution... silently.

A study by NEERI has revealed that noise levels in residential, commercial and industrial areas and silent zones of Delhi and priority towns of NCR far exceed the standards prescribed by CPCB. The average noise level in Delhi is 80 db in excess of recommended 55 db.

Despite so many dangers of noise pollution, The Environment Protection Act (1986) made just a passing reference to noise pollution. Although a notification was further issued in 1989 on ambient air quality standards vis-à-vis noise, but it hardly made any impact on controlling noise pollution. Fourteen years later in February 2000, Ministry of Environment and Forests woke up to the dire need for regulation and formulated the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules. The salient features of these rules are that the State governments, being the implementation authority, should initiate the process of controlling noise pollution by classifying the areas into residential, commercial, industrial and silent zones. The rules further provide that the governments should ensure that the noise levels do not exceed the prescribed limits. Although these rules are used by the judiciary to pass orders in cases where there is a violation, the implementing authority consider it politically incorrect to interfere with the cultural and religious celebrations. So, of what use are these rules.

In view of the above grim scenario, it is necessary to think of some measures to curb noise pollution. Some of the suggestions are as under:

Provide green cover along the main roads, railway tracks, and so on. Provide thick foliage between road dividers. To abate noise pollution by honking of vehicles, they should be compulsorily fitted with the type of horns as specified in the CMV (Rules) of 1998. The violators should be prosecuted and punished but till date no such action seems to have been taken. Roads with high intensity of vehicular movement should be made of porous asphalt, as done by the Netherlands, for busy roads carrying more than 35,000 vehicles a day. All factory workers should wear earmuffs. Public awareness about noise hazards to be created through TVs, popular seminars and simple published material. Noise pollution to be introduced as a subject in schools. The administration should implement, without fear, Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules 2000. Non-implementation of court orders, in respect of violators of the above rules, by the executive should be treated as contempt of court. The airlines should conform to noise regulations by using hush kitted or new generation aircrafts to reduce noise levels around airports. If we are serious about controlling noise pollution, we have to create awareness among the masses about the resulting hazards and trauma to their health due to noise. There is no cure for noise-induced permanent deafness and so the only choice is to prevent it through awareness. Regulatory authority can achieve precious little on their own as our past experience with industrial pollution has also shown. It is the community power that has helped in combating industrial pollution as brought out in the World Bank report entitled `Greening Industry: Communities, Markets and the Governments'. Some competent NGOs must take on the task of abating noise pollution by generating people's movement. Religious functions and the like should be no reason to cause noise pollution, as observed by the Supreme Court of India. (The author, a former Director of CSO, is a consultant on environment and poverty alleviation.)

UK's Noise Abatement Society (NAS)

Civic Initiatives, Campaigns, Ecological Societies, Foundations

Noise Abatement Society (NAS)

http://www.eco-web.com/register/04336.html

Charity in Noise Pollution to Offer the Public Direct Access to Advice; Environmental Information - Public Organisations: NGOs, Civic Initiatives, Campaigns, Ecological Societies, Foundations; Noise Protection - General Noise Protection Engineering: Architectural Acoustics, Soundproofing Design, Noise and Vibration Reduction Studies

Street	26 Brunswick Terrace, Flat 2
City	Brighton, East Sussex BN3 1HJ
Country	United Kingdom
Telephone	(+44) 1273 - 82 38 51
Facsimile	(+44) 1273 - 82 35 95
	@ ⓦ
Activities	Charity in Noise Pollution to Offer the Public Direct Access to Advice

Updated 2007-01-03

Areas of Involvement - Cross References

	Environmental Information Public Organisations
	Noise Protection General Noise Protection Engineering

◄

Environmental Noise Pollution : Causes, Evils, Legislation and Controls/Vijendra Mahandiyan

...the pollution of any kind is a slow poison, but 'environmental noise' is such a pollution, which is dire enemy of human brain and does not spare even animals and properties too...

Environmental Noise Pollution : Causes, Evils, Legislation and Controls/Vijendra Mahandiyan. New Delhi, Deep & Deep, 2006, xl, 446 p., $55. ISBN 81-7629-830-1.

Contents: Preface. Prelude. Abbreviations/Acronyms. 1. Introduction. 2. Causes of noise pollution. 3. Evil effects of noise pollution. 4. Sustainable development and quality of environment. 5. Legislation and judiciary. 6. Role of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and the duties of citizens. 7. Control of noise pollution: constructive suggestions. Appendices. Table of cases. Bibliography. Index.

"It is perhaps the first time, when human is dying of environmental pollution in hunt of overnight development and technological advancements. Though, the pollution of any kind is a slow poison, but 'environmental noise' is such a pollution, which is dire enemy of human brain and does not spare even animals and properties too. The noise pollution is in no way lesser hazardous than the air and water pollution. But, comprehensive legislation like water and air pollution is yet to be passed on noise. Although, the sweat music and soneral voice brings joy cordiality relaxations mental peace and makes life worth living but undesired noise brings disturbances to peace mental disorders and hence makes the life miserable. It is heartening that original text of Indian constitution is free from the word environment. In a long series of labour laws in India, the noise pollution is left unattended. It is only 1987, when environmental noise has been recognized, as a pollutant in India but public at large is still unaware about health hazards and remedies of the same.

To control noise pollution is a great cause before the whole humanity for its survival. This cause became the subject matter to this treatise. The book contains evil effects, causes and available legislation on noise pollution. A true effort has been attempted to comment upon legal provisions or case law on noise pollution. A need of sustainable development has been emphasized through this book. Role of NGOs and duties of citizens has been discussed in a lucid manner. The book is a practical approach to make the people understand their fundamental right to peaceful environment because rule of law must defend the rule of life and life will survive only when the biosphere is safe. Sustainable development is not a new idea, but growing concern of its problems and challenges on the globe is an additional feather of this book. The golden thread is the control of noise pollution, legal or extra legal.

The 'noise', an omen to human existence has now become a silent killer of the same; hence noise against the noise is constraining out.

The book explains in lucid language as under: the mechanism, how a sound enters the brain through ears and becomes noise; the existing noise levels in India and abroad with recommended safe limits; the environmental management in India; constitutions on environment; scattered law in Indian statutes on noise; noise, when amounts to an actionable nuisance; theory of substantial damage; evolution of environmental law in India; Judicial activism and environmental education; fundamental rights and the environment; right to clean environment; noise pollution versus right to religion; the role of public interest litigations; Asian country's constitution on environment; clean environment: a neglected human right and citizen's ignored duty." (jacket)

Return to Ecology / Environment Catalogue

Home

This book is available from: Vedams eBooks (P) Ltd. Vardhaman Charve Plaza IV, Building # 9, K.P Block, Pitampura, New Delhi 110 034, India Fax: 91-11-27310613 e-mail: vedams@vedamsbooks.com

Search for more books on this subject

Keyword :

"Copyright © 1996-2007 vedamsbooks.com. All Rights Reserved"

GoI proposes a BILL to curb NGO - as they make noise!

NGOs ask difficult questions and make loud noise regarding matters that the grand Officer/Commissioner would rather not have publicly aired.

http://www.indianexpress.com/story/160349._.html

Delhi- Pollution White Paper. Lofty. Practised?

WHITE PAPER ON POLLUTION IN DELHI

WITH AN ACTION PLAN

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTS
PARYAVARAN BHAWAN, C.G.O. COMPLEX
LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-110003

CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1 : Introduction

CHAPTER 2 : Air Pollution

CHAPTER 3 : Vehicular Pollution

CHAPTER 4 : Water Pollution

CHAPTER 5 : Solid Waste Management

CHAPTER 6 : Industrial Pollution

CHAPTER 7 : Noise Pollution

CHAPTER 8 : Institutional and Planning Aspects

CHAPTER 9 : Public Participation and General Awareness

CHAPTER 10 : Action Points : General

Abbreviations in action plan

List of Meetings/Participants

CHAPTER 7

Noise Pollution

1.0 Noise has been notified as a pollutant under the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. The main sources of noise pollution are automobiles, construction equipments, loudspeakers, bursting of crackers, etc. Noise is described as unwanted sound that produces deleterious effects on health and affects the physical and psychological well being of the people. In general terms, noise induced ailments are preventable but are difficult to cure after they have occurred. In recent times, public concerns about the rising trends in noise pollution have increased. High noise levels result in auditory fatigue and deafness. The non-auditory effects relate to interference with speech, causing annoyance and affecting efficiency. Increasing noise levels are also resulting in major social problems. Ambient standards in respect of sound for different categories of areas - residential, commercial, industrial and silence zones - have been notified under the Environment (Protection) Act. In many areas of Delhi the ambient noise levels far exceed the prescribed standards. In this respect, there is the need for regulating the use of loudspeakers, DG sets and use of horns in vehicles.

2.0 Ambient Noise Standards: Ambient air quality standards in respect of noise for different categories of areas (residential, commercial, industrial and sensitive) have been notified under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, which are as follows:

    
--------------------------------------------------------       
       Category of area         Limits in decibels/dB
                                  Day       Night
--------------------------------------------------------
       Industrial area            75         70
       Commercial area            65         55
       Residential area           55         45
       Silence Zone               50         40
--------------------------------------------------------

3.0 Noise Standards at Manufacturing Stage:

Noise limits have also been prescribed at the manufacturing stage for automobiles, domestic appliances and construction equipment, which are as follows:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Limits in dB(A)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a)  Motorcycle, Scooters and Three Wheelers                            80
(b)  Passenger Cars                                                     82
(c)  Passenger Commercial Vehicles upto 4 MT                            85
(d)  Passenger or Commercial Vehicles above  4 MT and upto 12 Mt        89
(e)  Passenger or Commercial Vehicles exceeding 12 MT                   91
(f)  Window Air Conditioners of 1 to 1.5 ton                            68
(g)  Air Coolers                                                        60
(h)  Diesel Generators for domestic purposes                         85-90
(I)  Refrigerators                                                      46
(j)  Compactors (rollers) Front Loaders, Concrete Mixers,
    Cranes (Movables) Vibrators and Saws                               75
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4.0 Codes of Practice: Besides above, the Code of practice for controlling noise other than industries and automobiles has been brought out for the following areas:

       
       -   Public Address Systems;
       -   Aircraft Operations;
       -   Railway Operations;
       -   Construction Activities and ;
       -   Bursting of Crackers.

5.0 Survey by Delhi Pollution Control Committee: The Delhi Pollution Control Committee has conducted noise survey in Delhi from August to October, 1996 in different parts of Delhi. The analysis of primary and secondary data and the indices have brought out the following noise pollution scenario in Delhi:

• Three wheelers, trucks and motorcycles remain the chief source or noise pollution on Delhi roads followed by generators in the residential, commercial and industrial locations.
• Fifteen of the forty six residential locations have noise level within the tolerable limits for over 90% of the time of the day. On the other extreme, 12 locations are noisy round the clock. The rural areas which are away from the main National highways have not yet caught up with the noise problem barring the locations where unauthorised industrial activities are taking place.
• All major commercial areas remain noisier than the tolerable limits with Chandni Chowk remaining highly noisy round the clock.
• Industrial areas by and large remained within the prescribed limits.
• Sensitive locations including the silence zones, including hospital areas, are alarmingly noisy.
• All major traffic corridors are highly noisy with peaks even crossing 100 dBA mark. Mahipalpur Crossing on NH-8 is noisiest round the clock. Andrew's Ganj Crossing on Ring Road is also alarmingly noisy.

6.0 Recomme ndations by DPCC to control Noise in Delhi: The DPCC survey report has recommended following steps for control of noise in Delhi:

• Ban on Pressure Horns to be effectively implemented.
• Well designed silencers and mufflers be installed on the vehicles, preferably at the manufacturers level. 3-Wheeler Autos to be phased out.
• Synchronised traffic signalling to be introduced on Ring Road and all other major traffic corridors including National Highways within the city limits.
• A comprehensive Traffic Management Plan including effective implementation and extension of traffic restrictions, construction of sub-ways and fly-overs be chalked out on priority. Only mild slope to be provided on approach roads of the fly overs.
• Use of generators for commercial and residential purposes may be banned. Generators used for industrial purposes should be properly enclosed and equipped with noise muffling devices.
• Extensive plantation of trees on the road curbs and the road side colonies be undertaken in a definite time target. North Delhi to be given priority.
• Hoardings of noise absorbent materials be encouraged.
• Adequate noise barriers be created around the hospitals schools and other locations in silence zones.
• City development plan to take adequate steps in advance to protect the habitants from the road side noise.
• Prescribed standards for home appliances and industrial machinery be enforced effectively.
• Mass awareness programmes be launched for people's participation, in noise abatement programme aided by continuous noise monitoring and display network at important locations in Delhi.

7.0 Loudspeakers: The stipulation of point noise standards for loudspeakers will enable their regulation under the environmental laws. Presently, the use of loudspeakers is regulated under laws pertaining to public nuisance or which relate to maintenance of law and order.

8.0 Generator sets: There are approximately 1 to 1.5 lakh portable electricity generating sets in Delhi in use in commercial and residential areas. The use of generator sets needs to be regulated under the municipal laws. Acoustic hoods should be made mandatory to muffle the sound. Point noise standards for generating sets will have to be prescribed under the environmental laws.

9.0 Regulation of Horns: The Motor Vehicles Act and the rules framed thereunder stipulate that every motor vehicle shall be constructed and maintained so as to conform to the noise standards approved by the Bureau of Indian Standards. While certain noise limits have been prescribed in the Environment (Protection) Act for automobiles at the manufacturing stage, provision also has to be made for regulating the use of horns while a vehicle is in use.

What the Government says on NOISE(ing)

MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 14 February, 2000

S.O. 123(E).- Whereas the increasing ambient noise levels in public places from various sources, inter-alia, industrial activity, construction activity, generator sets, loud speakers, public address systems, music systems, vehicular horns and other mechanical devices have deleterious effects on human health and the psychological well being of the people, it is considered necessary to regulate and control noise producing and generating sources with the objective of maintaining the ambient air quality standards in respect of noise;

Whereas a draft of Noise Pollution (Control and Regulation) Rules, 1999 was published under the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Environment and Forests vide number S.O. 528 (E) dated the 2e June, 1999 inviting objections and suggestions from all the persons likely to be affected thereby, before the expiry of the period of sixty days from the date on which the copies of the Gazette containing the said notification are made available to the public-,

And whereas copies of the said Gazette were made available to the public on the I" day of July, 1999.

And whereas the objections and suggestions received from the public in respect of the said draft rules have been duly considered by the Central Government-,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (ii) of sub-section (2) of section 3, sub-section (1) and clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 6 and section 25 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (29 of 1986) read with rule 5 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, the Central Government hereby makes the following rules for the regulation and control of noise producing and generating sources, namely:

The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000

1 Short-title and commencement.

(1) These rules may be called the-Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. Definitions.- In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires,

(a) "Act" means the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (29 of 1986);

(b) "area/zone" means all areas which fall in either of the four categories given in the Schedule annexed to these rules;

(c) "authority" means any authority or officer authorised by the Central Government, or as the case may be, the State Government in accordance with the laws in force and includes a District Magistrate, Police Commissioner, or any other officer designated for the maintenance of the ambient air quality standards in respect of noise under any law for the time being in force;

(d) "person" in relation to any factory or premises means a person or occupier or his agent, who has control over the affairs of the factory or premises;

(e) "State Government" in relation to a Union territory means the Administrator thereof appointed under article 239 of the Constitution.

3. Ambient air guality standards in respect of noise for different areas/zones.

(1) The ambient air quality standards in respect of noise for different areas/zones shall be such as specified in the Schedule annexed to these rules.

(2) The State Government may categorize the areas into industrial, commercial, residential or silence areas/zones for the purpose of implementation of noise standards for different areas.

(3) The State Government shall take measures for abatement of noise including noise emanating from vehicular movements and ensure that the existing noise levels do not exceed the ambient air quality standards specified under these rules.

(4) All development authorities, local bodies and other concerned authorities while planning developmental activity or carrying out functions relating to town and country planning shall take into consideration all aspects of noise pollution as a parameter of quality of life to avoid noise menace and to achieve the objective of maintaining the ambient air quality standards in respect of noise.

(5) An area comprising not less than 100 metres around hospitals, educational institutions and courts may be declared as silence area/zone for the purpose of these rules.

4. Responsibility as to enforcement of noise pollution control measures.

(1) The noise levels in any area/zone shall not exceed the ambient air quality standards in respect of noise as specified in the Schedule.

(2) The authority shall be responsible for the enforcement of noise pollution control measures and the due compliance of the ambient air quality standards in respect of noise.

5. Restrictions on the use of loud speakers/public address s1stem.

(1) A loud speaker or a public address system shall not be used except after obtaining written permission from the authority.

(2) A loud speaker or a public address system shall not be used at night (between 10.00 p.m. to 6.00 a.m.) except in closed premises for communication within, e.g. auditoria, conference rooms, community halls and banquet halls.

6. Consequences of any violation in silence zone/area.

Whoever, in any place covered under the silence zone/area commits any of the following offence, he shall be liable for penalty under the provisions of the Act:

(i) whoever, plays any music or uses any sound amplifiers,

(ii) whoever, beats a drum or tom-tom or blows a horn either musical or pressure, or trumpet or beats or sounds any instrument, or

(iii) whoever, exhibits any mimetic, musical or other performances of a nature to 44raq crowds.

7. Complaints to be made to the authority.

(1) A person may, if the noise level exceeds the ambient noise standards by 10 dB(A) or more given in the corresponding columns against any area/zone, make a complaint to the authority.

(2) The authority shall act on the complaint and take action against the violator in accordance with the provisions of these rules and any other law in force.

8. Power to vrohibit etc. continuance of music sound or noise.

(1) If the authority is satisfied from the report of an officer incharge of a police station or other information received by him that it is necessary to do so in order to prevent annoyance, disturbance, discomfort or injury or risk of annoyance, disturbance, discomfort or injury to the public or to any person who dwell or occupy property on the vicinity, he may, by a written order issue such directions as he may consider necessary to any person for preventing, prohibiting, controlling or regulating:

(a) the incidence or continuance in or upon any premises of -

(i) any vocal or instrumental music,

(ii) sounds caused by playing, beating, clashing, blowing or use in any manner whatsoever of any instrument including loudspeakers, public address systems, appliance or apparatus or contrivance which is capable of producing or re-producing sound, or

(b) the carrying on in or upon, any premises of any trade, avocation or operation or process resulting in or attended with noise.

(2) The authority empowered under sub-rule (1) may, either on its own motion, or on the application of any person aggrieved by an order made under sub-rule (1), either rescind, modify or alter any such order:

Provided that before any such application is disposed of, the said authority shall afford to the applicant an opportunity of appearing before it either in person or by a person representing him and showing cause against the order and shall, if it rejects any such application either wholly or in part, record its reasons for such rejection.

SCHEDULE
(see rule 3(l) and 4(l)

Ambient Air Quality Standards in respect of Noise

Area Code	Category of Area/Zone	Limits in dB(A) Leq *
		Day Time	NightTime
(A)	Industrial area	75	70
(B)	Commercial area	65	55
(C)	Residential area	55	45
(D)	Silence Zone	50	40

Note

1. Day time shall mean from 6.00 a.m. to 10.00 p.m.

2. Night time shall mean from 10.00 p.m. to 6.00 a.m.

3. Silence zone is defined as an area comprising not less than 100 metres around hospitals, educational institutions and courts. The silence zones are zones which are declared as such by the competent authority.

4. Mixed categories of areas may be declared as one of the four above mentioned categories by the competent authority.

*dB(A) Leq denotes the time weighted average of the level of sound in decibels on scale A which is relatable to human hearing.

A "decibel" is a unit in which noise is measured.

"A", in dB(A) Leq, denotes the frequency weighting in the measurement of noise and corresponds to frequency response characteristics of the human ear.

Leq : It is an energy mean of the noise level, over a specified period.

[F. No. Q-14012/l/96-CPA]
VIJAI SHARMA, R. Secy.

Rattling of Autos in Chennai

Chennai roads are cursed with high-decibel tune RATTLERS, which emit, highly disturbing noise. Everybody, you & me including - appear to have put up with it so nicely! How we allow ourselves to be taken for granted, against this noise.

I wish to constitute a NGO - against this noise menace.

I invite relevant suggestions.

We may form a club of like minded persons, who would lobby with the teeth-less PCBs, both State & Central and get it some good teeth.

Police are supposed to CURB this menace, su-moto. Perhaps, they are busy with 'helmet' enforcemment etc and sundry affairs. They should be educated first. The super cops are not traveling in this ordinary-mortals road, but travel in their cosy transports, and they could not 'listen' to this 'sound of music'.

Other politicos are also not concerned about the much harrassed citizens like me.

God Bless us.